Skip to main content

Real-World Case Studies

Let's look at real examples of companies that successfully optimised their marketing tech stack. These case studies show the framework in action.

Case Study 1: Professional Services Firm (20 Employees)​

Company Profile:

  • Industry: Legal services
  • Size: 20 employees, 5-person marketing team
  • Annual Revenue: £2M

Starting Point:

  • Tools:
    • HubSpot Professional: £800/month
    • Mailchimp: £50/month
    • Hootsuite: £49/month
    • Canva Pro (5 users): £50/month
    • SEMrush: £99/month
    • Hotjar: £39/month
    • Total: £1,087/month = £13,044/year

Problems:

  • Tools not integrated well
  • Paying for features not used
  • Multiple tools doing similar things
  • High cost relative to revenue

Analysis:

  • HubSpot includes email marketing (Mailchimp redundant)
  • Only 2 people use Canva Pro (paying for 5)
  • SEMrush used quarterly, not monthly
  • Hotjar valuable but could downgrade tier

Actions Taken:

  1. Cancelled Mailchimp (HubSpot covers email)
  2. Reduced Canva to 2 Pro accounts (others use free)
  3. Switched SEMrush to quarterly subscriptions (cancel/reactivate)
  4. Negotiated HubSpot discount (15% for annual billing)
  5. Downgraded Hotjar to lower tier

Results:

  • Previous Cost: £1,087/month
  • New Cost: £750/month
  • Monthly Savings: £337
  • Annual Savings: £4,044 (31% reduction)
  • Additional Benefits:
    • Better integration (fewer tools)
    • Simpler stack (easier to manage)
    • Team happier (less tool confusion)

Lessons Learned:

  • True redundancy (Mailchimp + HubSpot email) should be eliminated
  • Annual billing discounts add up
  • Usage-based tools can be paused when not needed
  • Regular audits catch redundancies
  • Tools should connect properly (HubSpot's native integrations work well)

Case Study 2: E-commerce Company (35 Employees)​

Company Profile:

  • Industry: E-commerce (fashion)
  • Size: 35 employees, 8-person marketing team
  • Annual Revenue: £5M

Starting Point:

  • Tools:
    • Shopify Plus: £2,000/month (platform, not marketing)
    • Klaviyo: £200/month
    • ActiveCampaign: £500/month
    • Google Ads: Variable
    • Meta Ads: Variable
    • Ahrefs: £99/month
    • Buffer: £6/month
    • Unbounce: £99/month
    • Hotjar: £39/month
    • Marketing Tools Total: £943/month = £11,316/year

Problems:

  • ActiveCampaign and Klaviyo overlap (both email + automation)
  • Paying for Ahrefs but only using basic features
  • Unbounce rarely used (Shopify pages work fine)
  • No central view of marketing stack

Analysis:

  • Klaviyo better for e-commerce (keep)
  • ActiveCampaign redundant (Klaviyo covers needs)
  • Ahrefs can downgrade to Lite plan
  • Unbounce not needed (Shopify pages sufficient)
  • Can consolidate social with Buffer (already cheap)

Actions Taken:

  1. Cancelled ActiveCampaign (Klaviyo handles email + automation)
  2. Cancelled Unbounce (using Shopify pages)
  3. Downgraded Ahrefs to Lite plan (£49/month)
  4. Negotiated Klaviyo annual discount (10%)
  5. Consolidated all social to Buffer

Results:

  • Previous Cost: £943/month
  • New Cost: £450/month
  • Monthly Savings: £493
  • Annual Savings: £5,916 (52% reduction)
  • Additional Benefits:
    • Simpler email/automation (one tool)
    • Better e-commerce integration (Klaviyo native)
    • Less confusion (fewer tools)

Lessons Learned:

  • E-commerce has specific tool needs (Klaviyo > generic email)
  • Platform-native tools often better than add-ons
  • Regular usage audits reveal unused tools
  • Industry-specific tools often outperform generic

Case Study 3: B2B SaaS Company (15 Employees)​

Company Profile:

  • Industry: B2B SaaS
  • Size: 15 employees, 3-person marketing team
  • Annual Revenue: £1.5M

Starting Point:

  • Tools:
    • Pipedrive: £50/month
    • ConvertKit: £29/month
    • Google Analytics: Free
    • LinkedIn Sales Navigator: £80/month
    • Calendly: £10/month
    • Loom: £10/month
    • Notion: £8/month
    • Total: £187/month = £2,244/year

Problems:

  • Low total cost but inefficient
  • Tools don't integrate well
  • Manual processes between tools
  • Growing team needs better system

Analysis:

  • Pipedrive is basic but works
  • ConvertKit is email-only, need marketing automation
  • Tools don't integrate well (manual processes)
  • Need better connectivity between tools
  • Consider adding marketing automation tool that connects well

Actions Taken:

  1. Kept Pipedrive (works for CRM needs)
  2. Added ActiveCampaign Starter (£50/month) for email + automation
  3. Set up API connections between Pipedrive and ActiveCampaign
  4. Kept other tools (they work and are cheap)
  5. Automated data flow between tools

Results:

  • Previous Cost: £187/month
  • New Cost: £237/month (added ActiveCampaign)
  • Monthly Increase: £50
  • Additional Benefits:
    • Marketing automation now included
    • Tools connect via APIs (no manual work)
    • Better reporting and analytics
    • Can replace individual tools if needed (flexibility)
    • No vendor lock-in

Lessons Learned:

  • Integration matters more than consolidation
  • Best-of-breed approach works better than all-in-one
  • API connections eliminate manual work
  • Flexibility is worth the extra cost
  • Can optimise individual tools without affecting others

Case Study 4: Agency (25 Employees) - Self-Hosting for Flexibility​

Company Profile:

  • Industry: Marketing agency
  • Size: 25 employees, 15-person team
  • Annual Revenue: £3M

Starting Point:

  • Tools:
    • ActiveCampaign: £500/month (large contact list)
    • HubSpot: £800/month (client management)
    • Various other tools: £500/month
    • Total: £1,800/month = £21,600/year

Problems:

  • Very high CRM/email costs
  • Technical team available
  • Long-term usage (5+ years expected)
  • Need for customisation

Analysis:

  • ActiveCampaign is biggest cost
  • Can be self-hosted
  • Technical team can manage it
  • Significant savings potential
  • Long-term usage justifies setup effort

Actions Taken:

  1. Researched self-hosting ActiveCampaign
  2. Set up server (DigitalOcean, £50/month)
  3. Migrated data and setup (20 hours, internal)
  4. Trained team on self-hosted system
  5. Cancelled SaaS subscription
  6. Set up maintenance procedures

Results:

  • Previous Cost: £500/month (ActiveCampaign SaaS)
  • New Cost:
    • Server: £50/month
    • Maintenance: ~3 hours/month = £150 value
    • Total: £200/month equivalent
  • Monthly Savings: £300
  • Annual Savings: £3,600 (72% reduction)
  • 3-Year Savings: £10,800
  • Additional Benefits:
    • Full data control
    • Customisation possible
    • No vendor lock-in
    • Can scale as needed

Lessons Learned:

  • Self-hosting makes sense for high-cost, long-term tools
  • Technical capability is essential
  • Significant savings over time
  • More control and flexibility

Key Takeaways from Case Studies​

Common Patterns:

  1. Integration problems are universal: Tools that don't connect create major inefficiencies
  2. True redundancy exists: Multiple tools doing the exact same thing should be consolidated
  3. All-in-one tools fail: There is never a tool that does everything well
  4. Best-of-breed works: Choose the best tool for each function, connect via APIs
  5. Flexibility matters: Tools that can be replaced reduce risk
  6. API access is critical: Tools without APIs create manual work and data silos
  7. Self-hosting provides flexibility: For high-cost tools, self-hosting reduces vendor lock-in

Success Factors:

  • Thorough audit (know what you have and how they connect)
  • Business needs assessment (tools must meet actual needs)
  • Integration focus (all tools must connect via APIs)
  • Flexibility planning (avoid vendor lock-in, ensure data portability)
  • Team input (know what's actually used)
  • Systematic approach (follow the framework)
  • Track results (measure improvements across all dimensions)

Previous: Step 7: Implementation & Risk Mitigation
Next: Common Pitfalls to Avoid