Skip to main content

Step 4: Evaluate Tool Fit, Flexibility & Risk

Vendor lock-in is real. Data portability matters. Flexibility protects your business. This step helps you assess whether you can actually change tools when you need to.

The Flexibility & Risk Problem​

The Core Issue:

  • Vendor lock-in: Can't switch tools even when you need to
  • Data trapped in tools: Can't export or migrate easily
  • All eggs in one basket: One vendor controls everything
  • Vendor dependency: What if they raise prices? Go out of business?
  • Inflexible tools: Can't adapt as your needs change

Why Flexibility Matters:

  • Business needs change over time
  • Vendors can change (prices, features, support)
  • You need to be able to adapt quickly
  • Data portability protects your business
  • Multiple vendors reduce risk

Assessing Vendor Lock-In Risk​

Red Flags:

  • Can't export your data easily
  • Data format is proprietary
  • No API access
  • Switching tools would lose historical data
  • All your tools from one vendor
  • Long-term contracts with penalties
  • Customisations that only work with that vendor

Questions to Ask:

  • Can we export all our data?
  • What format is the data in? (CSV, JSON, standard formats)
  • Is there an API to access data programmatically?
  • How long would it take to switch to a competitor?
  • What would we lose if we switched?
  • Are we locked into a contract?

Data Portability Assessment​

For each tool, check:

Export Capabilities​

  • Can you export all data? (contacts, campaigns, analytics, etc.)
  • What formats are available? (CSV, JSON, Excel, etc.)
  • Is the export complete? (all fields, all history)
  • How easy is the export process?

API Access​

  • Does the tool have an API?
  • Can you access all data via API?
  • Are there rate limits that would slow migration?
  • Is the API well-documented?

Data Ownership​

  • Who owns the data? (You or the vendor)
  • Can you take your data and leave?
  • Are there restrictions on data export?
  • What happens to your data if you cancel?

The "All-in-One" Tool Risk​

The Reality:

There is NEVER a tool that does everything well. Every time we analyse a company's tech stack, they have "the tool that does everything." It causes more problems than it's worth. You end up with mediocre solutions for everything.

Why All-in-One Tools Fail:

  • Jack of All Trades, Master of None: Does many things, none of them excellently
  • Feature Bloat: So many features it's hard to use
  • Poor Integrations: Can't connect well to other tools
  • Vendor Lock-In: All your eggs in one basket
  • Inflexible: Can't customise for your specific needs
  • Expensive: Paying for features you don't need
  • Slow to Update: Harder to improve when doing everything

The Risk:

  • If vendor raises prices → you're stuck
  • If vendor goes under → you lose everything
  • If vendor changes features → you're forced to adapt
  • If you need to switch → massive migration project
  • If one part breaks → everything breaks

Building a Flexible Stack​

Best-of-Breed Approach:

  • Choose the best tool for each specific need
  • Tools that excel at what they do
  • Tools that connect via APIs
  • Tools that can be replaced individually

Benefits:

  • Best solution for each problem
  • Can replace one tool without affecting others
  • Less vendor dependency
  • More flexibility to adapt
  • Better integrations (APIs work better)

Example:

  • Instead of: HubSpot for everything (CRM + Email + Analytics + Social)
  • Better: HubSpot (CRM) + Klaviyo (Email) + Google Analytics (Analytics) + Buffer (Social)
  • Why: Each tool is best-in-class, connects via APIs, can be replaced individually

Self-Hosting as Flexibility Strategy​

Self-Hosting Provides:

  • Data Control: Your data, your servers
  • No Vendor Lock-In: You control the software
  • Customisation: Modify as needed
  • Portability: Can move to different hosting
  • Independence: Not dependent on vendor's business decisions

When Self-Hosting Makes Sense:

  • High vendor lock-in risk with SaaS
  • Need for data control and portability
  • Customisation requirements
  • Long-term usage (2+ years)
  • Technical capability available

Self-Hosting vs. SaaS:

  • SaaS: Easy to use, vendor manages, but locked in
  • Self-Hosted: More control, more flexibility, but more responsibility

Risk Mitigation Strategies​

Diversify Vendors​

  • Don't put all tools with one vendor
  • Spread risk across multiple vendors
  • If one vendor has issues, others continue working

Ensure Data Portability​

  • Only use tools with good export capabilities
  • Regular data exports as backups
  • API access for programmatic data access
  • Standard data formats (not proprietary)

Avoid Long-Term Contracts​

  • Prefer monthly/annual over multi-year
  • Negotiate exit clauses
  • Keep flexibility to switch

Build with APIs​

  • Tools that connect via APIs are more flexible
  • Can build custom integrations
  • Can switch tools more easily
  • Data flows between systems automatically

Flexibility & Risk Checklist​

For each tool:

  • Can we export all our data?
  • Is data in a standard format?
  • Does it have API access?
  • How long would it take to switch?
  • What would we lose if we switched?
  • Are we locked into a contract?
  • Is this our only tool from this vendor?
  • What happens if vendor raises prices?
  • What happens if vendor goes under?
  • Can we customise it for our needs?

Previous: Step 3: Assess Tool Integration & API Availability
Next: Step 5: Identify Redundancies & The "All-in-One" Myth